Did John Travola DOE ANOTHER JOHN, He Can Prove It?

Did John Travolta DOE ANOTHER JOHN, He Can Prove It?

 

 

Another "John Doe" has come forward and filed a similar lawsuit as the first masseur did against John Travolta.  The 2nd accuser is using the same attorney and filing the complaint under "John Doe" as well.  The person claims they have evidence to support their claims and have witnesses to back his their story.  Both claimants are now suing for sexual harassment as well.  The alleged victim is making some shocking allegations against the Pulp Fiction actor.  The suit says:

 

On the morning of the massage Travolta had "a strange demeanor, bloodshot eyes and climbed onto the already setup massage table…Travolta removed the entire sheet from his body, and he claimed the sheets were sticky and could not tolerate the heat…Travolta further indicated that he likes a lot of "Glutes" work meaning a massage on his buttocks…While he was massaging near Travolta's buttocks area, Travolta would open his legs and spread his butt cheeks open and had a full erection and would maneuver in a way to try to force Doe Plaintiff No. 2 to touch his anus and around his anus."

 "Travolta suddenly turned on his stomach with his legs wide open with a full erection. He then tried to force Doe Plaintiff No. 2's hand on Travolta's scrotum. Then, Travolta started to grab, rub and caress Doe Plaintiff no. 2's upper thighs and buttocks….Travolta still had an erection and wanted his abdominals done, but Travolta's erection was in the way and he refused to have his penis covered by a sheet of a pillow case cover…Travolta started masturbating about 15 minutes left in the session, and Doe Plaintiff No.2, said he had to go," the docs state.

 

Travolta has a very high-profile attorney, Marty Singer. He released a statement vehemently denying the accusations.  He further stated the the suit is:

"absurd and fictional" … and says they're "just as fabricated" as the claims made by John Doe #1 in the initial lawsuit filed May 4th. 

 

Both accusers are suing for $2 million dollars.

 

Comment or Share the Love

 

 

 

 

Did John Trovolta Pulp a Masseur’s Fiction?

Did John Trovolta Pulp a Masseur's Fiction?

 

JohnTravolta

 

 

Actor John Travolta is in hot water as a masseur suing him alleging he tried to have sex with him during a session.  TMZ reports:

 

According to the lawsuit, Travolta saw the masseur's ad online, and scheduled an appointment for $200 an hour. The masseur did not know it was Travolta when the appointment was booked, but followed instructions and met up with a black Lexus SUV, which Travolta was driving.  
 
According to the suit, Travolta and the masseur, who says he saw Trojan condoms in the center console, drove to the Beverly Hills Hotel and went to Travolta's bungalow.
 
The suit claims Travolta stripped naked, appearing semi-erect. The masseur says he told Travolta to lay down on the table and the first hour went without incident. Then, according to legal docs, Travolta began rubbing the masseur's leg, touched his scrotum and the shaft of his penis.  
 
The masseur claims he told Travolta he did not have sex with his clients, but Travolta was undeterred, offering to do a "reverse massage," adding, "Come on dude, I'll jerk you off!!!"
 
The suit goes on to allege Travolta then masturbated and told the masseur he got to where he was "due to sexual favors he had performed when he was in his 'Welcome Back Kotter' days," adding "Hollywood is controlled by homosexual Jewish men who expect favors in return for sexual activity."
 
The masseur — who is only listed as John Doe — claims Travolta called him a loser, but then doubled the hourly rate and sent him on his way.
 
The suit seeks $2 million plus punitive damages.
 
 
A representative for John has said that John was on the East Coast on the day the massuer alleges the incident happened and the lawsuit is a complete fabrication.  They also pointed out the person who filed the lawsuit filed it under "John Doe" and John is confident he will get the case thrown out and will sue the person and their representation for malicious prosecution.